In 2005, the RAND corporation released a report on homegrown terror threats in which they identify the terror threat not as one of radicalized Muslims driven by religious fervour, but protestors and activists driven by opposition to the ideals of the globalists.
“Developing imperatives stemming from anti-globalization do appear to be providing a radical domestic context for galvanizing the militancy of both the far right as well as those driven by more specific extremist environmental agendas.”
Since then, the entire process of demonizing political opponents through the use of the word-weapon “terrorist” has descended into the most absurd form of political farce, with a flurry of reports from the Missouri Information Analysis Center to the State government of Virginia to the Texas Department of Public Safety claiming increasingly ridiculous indicators of terrorism, from buying baby formula to wearing blue jeans to carrying a driver’s licence.
All of this terror hysteria that the public has been force-fed over the past decade would be utterly incomprehensible if we were to understand “terrorist” to mean what you and I and John Q. Public believe it means. But it does not. You see, in our modern world “terrorism” is not terrorism. It does not describe a tactic, it is not about violence and bloodshed, suicide bombers or Allahu Akhbar. It is not a word, it is a weapon, a weapon aimed at those who disagree with the aims of Heinz Kissinger and all of his Bilderberg/CFR/Trilateralist ilk, those who wish for the supremacy of a small, rich elite of financiers and multi-national monopoly capital thugs.
Terrorism is not a word, not a concept. It is a weapon that is aimed at you and me.
And that, in the final equation, is our opportunity. We can point out that terrorism is a word, and it does describe the actions of the bloodthirsty elite who kill and maim the innocent, who start wars or overthrow governments or incite violence to achieve their aims. And in that simple action, that reclaiming of the word “terrorism” to identify the globalist kingpins who have been puppeteering international politics for generation after generation, we can disarm Kissinger and all the other pimps of the war on terror hysteria.
the only way out is a new system, a new economical system, a new capitalist system.. dump the lot wall street and the rest as the issue is money and corruption, European Marshall plan is corruption to the core. moreover doctor strange love is just around the corner and a nuclear Holocaust Du to the parasites will kill them and us, we shall all perish because of their greed incompetence and ego. the persistence of the elite is the most dangerous outcome of this global civil war...
This is a very good and interesting report; surely could not be done any better than this.
To bremont:
A new economical system - agreed - but not new capitalist system. This would mean private ownership, profit-driven markets, and new imperialism, rather quickly. Let me remind you that "new capitalist economic system" is what the global financial elite wants and is trying to implement since the 30's. This is just a tool to achieve global political control. This would lead to the end of democracy and human rights. No, you must not talk about "new economic system" unless it is publicly owned, controlled, and run.
"Bullseye!"
Root out the band of vipers{a la Andrew Jackson}
Get rid of those useless eaters at the CFR/ Trilateral/ Blewit burgers, including that fat ass Kissoff and Zbig, R. Hass,et al
And do it soon ...or we are all doomed (Marc Farber)
The US Government is no longer in power. It is the CFR, the Tri Lateral Commission and the Bilderbergers and the House of Rothschilds of England are the fathers of this family of terrorists. Henry Kissinger and Zbigniew Bzrezinski and Obama are the past and present leaders of Globalism at any cost of life or money. Terrorism starts with the wealthy elite and while the politicians always want to talk and negotiate with the largest military power backing them up and the various Economic hitmen to show the sincerity of the negotiations, one must imagine the show of force and deceptions in order for these wealthy killers watch and enjoy the sport as the crowds watches the Gladiators kill and be killed in the colloseum. Define terrorism correctly and not politically correctly. start with the CFR and work your way to the top at the house of Rothschilds. These are the real terrorists. Only a mass world revolution will bring about change because it is no longer confined to the USA but all over the world where the military have siezed power with money and puppet regimes.
Here are some facts on the war on terror that will never be made known to the public at large because of the severity of crimes that were committed...
Tell me how a Most Wanted Terrorist who was under a U.S. Federal Indictment when he was captured was eventually dumped back into the public domain ~~ HOW DO THE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS AT ALL LEVELS WHO KNOW ALL ABOUT THIS AS I DO ~~ LIVE WITH THEMSELVES ~~ THESE SCUMBAGS SHOULD NOT EVEN POSSESS A BADGE OR A GUN ANY LONGER & BY NO MEANS ARE A UPRIGHT LAW ENFORCEMENY OFFICER ~~ MILITARY PERSONNEL TOO AS WELL AS THOUGH POSSESSING NATIONAL SECURITY CREDENTIALS / CLEARANCES...
Fazul Abdullah Mohammed was captured with Aafia Siddiqui on 5/29/2004 in Port St. Lucie, Florida at 6 PM as a direct result of me hunting them down & calling 911 ~~ captures were covered-up & he was eventually dumped in Somalia around 1/2007 ~ since it was reported they said he was there ~ they knew he was there because they put him there ~ a CIA op. who was just killed to silence everything that he may have knew / known...
Read all about it at :
www.360.yahoo.com/caspereraser1
What Anglo-American critics like this Corbett character do not want to admit is that all this rhetoric about "globalists" or "globalization" are merely euphemisms for Capitalism in general and Anglo-American Imperialism in particular.
Anti-globalists of the USA, Canada, etc. are attempting to divert political attention away from their beloved Capitalist system and Anglo imperialist nations by obsessively fixating on these buzzwords of "globalization" or "globalist"--
without examining what they actually mean.
In this sense, you might call these anti-globalists a type of false-flag (i.e. phony) dissidents who wish to channel discontent and dissension away from their imperial capitalist system onto some political bogeyman.
The very idea of globalization itself was not coincidentally broadly popularized and promoted by the United States in the early 1990s after the 'Death of Communism."
That is, globalization was merely a euphemism for the expansion of an America-led capitalist system into large swathes of the world that had been effectively insulated from the USA and global capitalism during the Cold War.
With no more Soviet Union or Communist bloc, Western-style free market capitalism... I mean... democracy could now penetrate unhindered into every corner of the globe.
America of course would serve as the enforcer and overlord of this global capitalist system with the ability to militarily threaten, discipline, and, if need be, invade any recalcitrant nation that resisted what George Bush Sr. declared to be a New World Order in the early 1990s.
The New World Order--contrary to what American "anti-globalists" assert--is not some foreign or international conspiracy, but rather a disingenous euphemism for this American-enforced global capitalist system ... for what the Pentagon calls US Full Spectrum Dominance of the planet.
Most so-called "anti-globalists" effectively obscure this geopoliltical reality and agenda in the fulminations about the New World Order.
"Full Spectrum Dominance: Totalitarian Democracy in the New World Order"
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=14046