This week GRTV talks to Mahdi Nazemroaya, a research associate of the Centre for Research in Globalization who spent two months in Libya before escaping after the rebel siege of Tripoli. We discuss what really happened in Libya, including the war crimes perpetrated by NATO in support of the rebels, and how the media helped to enable those war crimes by covering up for the perpetrators.
Subscribe to the podcast: http://ur1.ca/50ptm
Can you please clarify if Mahdi meant that he arrived on the 20th June which would make it two months or he was only there for just over one month if he arrived on the 20th July. These sorts of details will be used to try and discredit both him and GRTV. I am an avid fan of Globalresearch and i believe it is a very important and credible source of vital imformation if you are seeking the "TRUTH". Keep up the good work and I'm glad Mahdi is back safe.
Mike
@Coughlan. Mahdi Darius arrived on in June. He says it in a lot of other places. Corbett is the one sets him off balance by getting the months wrong.
From time to time, Globalresearch.ca will have some very keen insights regarding severe omissions from or distortions within the Client Press's disinformation campaign about world events. For example, the reporting on the origins of "Al Qaeda" and the constantly changing narrative we are fed by mainstream news outlets - who simply quote DoD & Intel spokespersons - which keeps switching where Al Qaeda is located, its mysterious "presence" outside of wherever its home base is claimed to be this month, with which "affiliates" it is involved, how our own government interacts with these said "affiliates", how big the organization is, who its leaders actually are, what role these supposed leaders play, the organization's supposed "recruitment techniques" and "media wing," etc.
But, for God's sake, Professor Chossudovsky, PLEASE ENFORCE MORE RIGOROUS EDITORIAL STANDARDS.
I think it can be said without controversy that there is not enough work done to provide rigorous citations for the many controversial claims made in many articles featured by the site.
Chossudovsky needs to rise above the extremely lax standards of the mainstream press - which has tried, with near success, to claim a monopoly on credibility - and exercise hyper vigilance in the citation of the most credible sources possible for all of its claims. There are many insights into Imperialistic Geostrategy, synarchy, the rise of multinational corporate fascism, etc. coming from these articles: but we really need to improve the editorial standards to gain more traction!