The Science of September 11

Excellent video, but while it's apparently clipped from an AE911Truth video, perhaps in addition to some videos by other groups or people, when was the original video made, what was the title of the original AE911Truth video, what do the revisions consist of, exactly, and who revised the original video or videos? What's been revised, exactly?

The above sort of additional information can be helpful in multiple respects; especially for "questionning minds".

I don't believe Richard Gage, Steven Jones, Niels Harrit, David Chandler, as well as a few or more of the other people who speak in this video, are saying anything they haven't said in the past; based on what I previously heard each of them say in plenty of video presentations. But, there are some real images and some graphics that I don't recall having previously seen; the "meteorite" mass of fused elements from the WTC fallout being one example. I think to have seen or read something about that fused mass, before, but don't recall having seen what's shown about this in this video; and the way the subject is presented in this video certainly is appreciable. We see that fused mass for ourselves, and get a good explanation about it.

I'm not sure about everything Richard Gage says in this video, but what's said by David Chandler and Niels Harrit, as well as some of the other engineers and scientists speaking in this video, it's nothing new. Their parts seem to mostly or else entirely be from past videos.

Actually, I just checked the WTCDemolition channel at Youtube and the user has a slightly older version of this video, so I guess it's a compilation of his or her own making, using clips from past AE911Truth videos, and possibly some that were made by other groups or people, after which WTCDemolition made some revisions to his or her own compilation.

Jane Pollicino, who speaks at the start of this video and who lost her 48-year-old husband in the 9/11 attacks, says something I hadn't heard or read before. It's when she says that we deserve an explanation for the 700 or more bone fragments (obviously of 9/11 victims) found on the roof of a Deutsche bank building somewhere near the WTC Towers that were destroyed.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deutsche_Bank_Building

Let me take a wild guess at what the significance is of those bone fragments at that location. Let's see. Hmmm. Without being an expert, my guess would be that if the NIST explanation was true, then fragments of bones of victims in the WTC Towers that were destroyed wouldn't have been propelled outwardly, or not enough to end up on the top of that bank, anyway. If that guess is, so far, valid, then its extension is that the bone fragments on the roof of that bank are one of the elements of proof that the WTC Towers were explosively destroyed; rather than having been destroyed due to the planes hitting those towers.

Even if the planes were large to us, they were tiny compared to the mass of those towers. I've never read or heard anyone speak about 9/11 in this sense, but the thought has crossed my mind a number of times when seeing footage of the planes striking and entering, or somehow combining with, Towers 1 and 2. The planes made sizable holes, but while those holes were of greater dimension than the planes that hit there, the holes were also tiny compared to the complete structures of those towers. If the holes caused by the planes hitting were 1/4, 1/3, 1/2, whatever, the size of the towers, then it'ld be relatively easy for most people to believe that the planes hitting the towers did cause them to be destroyed ; but they were tiny holes compared to the sizes of these towers made of extremely strong construction. The holes were tiny compared to the towers, and the planes were of smaller overall dimension than these holes, in the exterior walls that were hit anyway.

I don't have a clue what damage was caused within the towers by those planes striking, but believe that it's at 911review.com that there's an article that says that much of the structure, carapace (shells), whatever, of these two planes was pulverized upon striking the exterior walls. Believing that that's true, at the speed these planes hit the towers against massive concrete and steel support, and because we see huge balls of flames when the planes hit the exterior walls, there would've been less internal damage; other than what was caused by fire from remaining jet fuel that hadn't burned up yet, and super-strong metalic parts of the planes that could've gone into and possibly exited the other sides of these towers. (Some people have reported that one of the plane engines was found on the ground on the opposite side of one of the two towers.)

And I think it was the same article that said that either much or else most of the jet fuel burst into flames as the planes struck the buildings, leaving that much of the fuel was already burned up outside, rather than having burned inside the towers. It'ld mean that definitely not all of the jet fuel burned inside these towers.

We have video-taped proof that the fires inside the two towers burned out long enough before the towers were finally destroyed. And if the jet fuel flowed out and went down elevator shafts, f.e., then I believe that we'ld still have some evidence of this, for it surely, probably anyway, would've caused more smoke; I think, anyway. If recalling correctly, there was no smoke being emitted from either of the two towers just before they were destroyed. And when they were destroyed, there was little smoke, if any at all, but there were HUGE clouds of pulverized concrete, et cetera; not quite the same thing as smoke, I believe.

The immediately above paragraph is not to say that no jet fuel flowed enough to reach elevators and then pour down into elevator shafts. The point only is to say that we know that the fires burned out well before the towers were finally destroyed and, therefore, probably, if not surely, weren't the cause of the destruction of these buildings; from the mere fact that the fires had already burned out, hence ceased, well before the towers destructed.

God bless Jane Pollicino and all "9/11 Families" who demand truthful investigation, and God bless everyone else who supports this demand, as well.

Excellent video, and isn't it funny that there hasn't been a word from the corrupt Popular Mechanics since it's bogus so-called debunking of 9/11 truth research results several years ago? If they truly had an argument proving that AE911Truth and other researchers have been mistaken in their analyses, then we would've surely heard from PM again, but we haven't; not as far as I know anyway. So, and assuming that PM has since been silent, there'ld evidently be corruption that was involved on their end when they pretended to be able to competently debunk 9/11 truth research findings. Either that, or they were awfully incompetent. My guess? Corruption.

The real 9/11 researchers withstand the "test of time", while PM et al seem to have greatly vanished from the 9/11 scene.

So far, no one has been able to competently debunk 9/11 truth researchers, the real and qualified ones, and if it hasn't happened, yet, then the likelihood that it'll ever happen is what? Well, my guess is that the right answer is either nil, or virtually nil, which is to say extremely unlikely. And simply nil is more probable, I believe.

And we'll have people 100 years from now still demanding a truthful investigation; with the rate of success so far obtained with Washington, anyway. It's a situation to greatly not be found in.

Why? Well, inside job, evidently. What other plausible/credible reason is there for such silence and obstruction on the part of Washington? They know what they're doing and know what much of the population wants with regards to 9/11 ; a truthful, real investigation. So what's the problem, what's holding up this process of justice?

Well, my guess is that Washington's been working and continues to work to cover up very incriminating evidence and analysis. For Washington, only others are bad people, while we citizens are supposedly to believe that we have honest as well as competent govt or governance. Balony! And feed that junk food to Washington elites ; fill/stuff them with it until their stomachs are so full that there's no room for adding more balony, for what was already placed in them has reached the point that it's coming out of their mouths, ears and nostrils, stuffing them "real good", with junk-food balony. Well, we don't have to bother with that. They're already full of balony, anyway.

They make themselves very obvious criminals with their constant rejection of being held accountable. And only criminals would act this way.

1+1 still = 2, today, and the physical "law" of gravity still continues to hold true as well.