Aftermath: Unanswered Questions from 9/11

Your browser is not able to display this multimedia content.

Peter Dale Scott
Michael Ruppert
April 14, 2012


Aftermath: Unanswered Questions from 9/11
by grtv

With the ongoing controversy over the federal probe into the September 11 terrorist attacks, GNN decided in 2003 to pre-empt the government and produce its own version of a 'truth commission' with: "AfterMath: Unanswered Questions from 9/11".

Narrated by Hip Hop legend Paris and featuring interviews shot by GNN syndicate producers in six cities, AfterMath is a video series featuring nine (9) people answering eleven (11) of the most pressing questions that emanate from the terrible and, as yet, unexplained, events of that day.

This video from 2003 features statements by Peter Dale Scott and Michael Ruppert.

As you will see, these are questions that continue to overshadow and critically challenge the official 'version' of the story. The full series features: George Soros, (billionaire philanthropist), Mary Schiavo (Aviation Disaster Attorney), Mike Ruppert (Publisher: From the Wilderness), Nafeez Ahmed (Author: The War on Freedom), David McMichael (former CIA analyst), Michel Chossudovsky (Author: War and Globalization), Peter Dale Scott (Professor Emeritus, UC Berkeley), Alex Jones (Editor:, John Judge (Founder, C.O.P.A.), Riva Enteen (Exec. Director, SF National Lawyer's Guild).

This video originally aired in 2003.


2012 / 04 / 15
michael j. willman says:

To whom it may concern,

Perpetuating frauds such as Michael Ruppert and Peter Dale Scott, based on the preponderance of their 9/11 contributions and previous work, only serves to undermine the the solid work of the real heroes. And, it certainly calls into question the legitimacy of Global Research on the whole. It is tragic that so much is invested in an effort to mislead, and that the audience isn't more discerning.

2012 / 04 / 15
Shawn Sanders says:

To Michael j. willman
Michael you manage to make opinion/comment with absolutely no discussion of anything at all to do with 911....or anything to do with the subject matter at hand. You don't challenge what is said, you don't discuss what is said, nor do you offer any counter points to the ones being made. Instead, you move along the ad hominem route.
The lawyer's maxim is:
That when you have no case, you attack your opponent.

When you make silly ad hominem statements it doesn't help your argument, as it indicates emotion rather than clear thinking.

2012 / 04 / 15
Whitehawk says:

It has long been PROVEN that 9/11 was an "inside job" committed by our very government.

The only question remains: Why have we allowed those directly involved to go free??? Treason was committed against the citizens of the US, as well as the citizens of the world. Murders and thieves are running the country.

2012 / 04 / 16
jon urban says:

mossad not muslims did 9/11/01

2012 / 04 / 16
jon urban says:
2012 / 04 / 16
Akama says:

This event took place in San Francisco nine years ago in 2003. Why is it being offered up as warmed over stale toast in April of 2012?? That is a very serious question to ponder and consider. So much has been revealed since that time for evidence and understanding, and speculation and theory Ruppert whose work was so important early on was wise enough to abandon ship on the 911 inquiry having come to the conclusion that the evidence had been destroyed or buried too deeply and that we would never really know what happened. Most regrettably, that is likely to be the verdict of the economic and political coup which changed everything so tragically so quickly. Mercy.

This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Related videos

Our newsletter